What We’re Reading: “MIT Abandons Its Mission. And Me.”

“I am a professor who just had a prestigious public science lecture at MIT cancelled because of an outrage mob on Twitter. My crime? Arguing for academic evaluations based on academic merit.”

Flashback: “Memo reveals UNC plan to sideline ‘diversity of thought’”

Raleigh, N.C. — Three months ago, Senate Leader Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) sounded the alarm on the ascendant doctrine in American academic and cultural institutions.

He said of the doctrine’s adherents: “They seek to promote in students a theology, a belief system, that is fundamentally at odds with the Declaration of Independence, Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” Adherents target those who oppose the doctrine, seeking to punish them for speaking up.

Indeed, top leadership at UNC-Chapel Hill recently circulated a policy memorandum expressing the University’s active effort to target “diversity of viewpoint in our definition of diversity.” Campus leaders said that diversity of viewpoint and racial equity “cannot sit side by side without coming into conflict.”

The latest example is outlined on Bari Weiss’s substack. A University of Chicago professor proposed students and college applicants be judged on merit alone in a framework he cheekily dubbed “Merit, Fairness, and Equality (MFE)” to contrast with race-obsessed “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.”

For his sin, a Twitter mob sought to silence the professor:

“They argued on Twitter that I should not be invited to give science seminars at other universities and coordinated replacement speakers. . .Sure enough, this strategy was employed when I was chosen to give the Carlson Lecture at MIT — a major honor in my field. It is an annual public talk given to a large audience and my topic was ‘climate and the potential for life on other planets.’ On September 22, a new Twitter mob, composed of a group of MIT students, postdocs, and recent alumni, demanded that I be uninvited.

“It worked. And quickly.”

The professor continues:

“We all need to decide what type of country we want our children to grow up in. Do we want a culture of fear and repression in which a small number of ideologues exert their power and cultural dominance to silence anyone who disagrees with them? Or do we want our children to enjoy truth-seeking discourse consisting of good-natured exchanges that are ultimately grounded in a spirit of epistemic humility?

“If you want the latter, it’s time to stand up and so say. It’s time to say no to the mob, no to the cancellations. And it’s time to be forthright about your true opinions.”

--

--

--

Press releases from N.C. Senate Republicans and Senate Leader Phil Berger

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Youth Advocate Programs (YAP), Inc. Celebrates Mentors and More

Psychologist Shweta Answers Educators’ Queries On How To Tackle Uncertainty & Anxiety

How I Homeschool During the Coronavirus: An Interview with Emily Chen

Thanks for the endorsement, professor

It’s not what you know but who: How social relationships shape research impact

Social Realities of Knowledge for Development_Graphic

Four Lessons Learned in Rolling Out Teacher Career Progressions

What are the types of questions in the IELTS academic writing test?

Should Students Be Allowed To Resume Schools?

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Senator Berger Press Shop

Senator Berger Press Shop

Press releases from N.C. Senate Republicans and Senate Leader Phil Berger

More from Medium

Typhoon Odette — A Photo Series (Part 1)

We And Covid-19

How Technical SEO Impacts How Your Site Rankings

How Technical SEO Impacts How Your Site Rankings

You need a Companion in FundRaising