Impartial Anita’s Tweet of the Day: “This Week Was Vote Suppression on Steroids in the NC Legislature”

Senator Amy Galey
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 21, 2022

Impartial Anita’s Tweet of the Day: “This Week Was Vote Suppression on Steroids in the NC Legislature”

Eric Holder paid six figures to get Justice Earls elected so she could hear his lawsuit

Justice Earls ran for the court so she could impose her political will, not rule impartially on questions of law

Sen. Galey: “If the court continues down this path, judicial races will be among the most expensive and vicious contests in the state.”

Raleigh, N.C. — Former Attorney General Eric Holder funneled $250,000 to elect Supreme Court Justice Anita Earls so she could hear his lawsuit (see picture below). But that’s not the only example of Justice Earls’s bias against Republicans.

We’re sending out regular screenshots of Justice Earls’s past public statements to showcase just how biased she is.

Here is Impartial Anita’s Tweet of the Day: “This Week Was Vote Suppression on Steroids in the NC Legislature.”

Given her past statements and the six-figure contribution from her megadonor Eric Holder, is there any question of how Justice Earls will rule on political cases?

She is on the court to enact far-left liberal policies and to overturn conservative policies. If this trend continues, the court will become a de facto oligarchy. Its partisan makeup will determine the policy direction of the state.

Sen. Amy Galey (R-Alamance) said, “If the court continues down this path, judicial races will soon be among the most expensive and vicious contests in the state.”

Sen. Galey continued, “The perception of corruption on display here is stunning. Eric Holder paid six figures to get Justice Earls elected so she could hear his lawsuit. Is this really the future liberals want?”

Justice Earls’s conflicts are obvious and egregious. Imagine the outcry if, say, an oil company gave six figures to elect a judge and then brought a suit to overturn environmental regulations before that same judge.

Yet the so-called “good government” groups are silent. That should tell you all you need to know about their “principles.”